Creating a balanced analysis template
I need to provide a balanced analysis template without browsing capabilities. My knowledge cutoff is October 2024, so I should avoid inventing specifics about any recent match and suggest the user share match info or a clip. I can mention general factors for controversial penalties, like handball criteria (unnatural arm position, distance, deflection), different foul thresholds, and the VAR "clear and obvious" standard. A quick evaluation checklist will help keep it concise, adhering to the style guidelines with minimal formatting.Compiling a helpful analysis framework
I want to create some bullet points for the user. First, I'll ask for specific match details like the opponent, competition, and the minute of the incident. I can give a brief overview that controversial penalties often involve handball, soft contact, or VAR decisions with a high threshold. I’ll outline relevant IFAB Law 12 criteria and judgment angles. If they want, I can review the clip or discuss similar Liverpool incidents, and maybe consider expected goals if they provide stats. Just keeping it friendly and concise!
想聊这场吗？给我几个关键信息我能更具体：对手/赛事、争议点球发生在第几分钟、犯规类型（手球/拉拽/踩踏/撞人）或有无VAR介入/回看时长。若有视频片段更好。
先给你一套快速判罚核对清单（按IFAB法则与VAR标准）：
- 接触性质：是否“鲁莽/不小心/使用过度力量”；轻微接触但明显改变进攻者跑动/平衡才更倾向判罚。
- 进攻者行为：是否主动“造接触”（切线路、勾脚、拖碰）；若主要由进攻者造成，通常不应判点。
- 机会与方向：球是否可控、离门距离/角度、是否真正影响了进攻（影响小则倾向不判）。
- 手球要点：手/臂位置是否不自然、是否扩大体积、距离与反应时间、是否明显偏转；守方先触球不自动免罪。
- VAR门槛：“明显且显著错误”才介入；若主裁现场有视线并作出合理判断，VAR不该推翻边际判罚。
- 一致性：本场/本轮类似接触是否有一致尺度；不一致往往被认为“牵强”。
你想要哪种输出？
- 规则解读：按你描述的具体动作，判断按规则应否判点。
- 战术影响：萨拉赫缺阵对进攻与罚点前后的局势影响。
- 裁判复盘稿：逐条评估证据、VAR流程与可能更合理的判罚。
- 数据侧：若给出技术统计/xG/犯规分布，我做赛后要点与胜负因素拆解。