Clarifying Toney's situation

I’m thinking about how to respond to questions about Ivan Toney's tax situation. Should I ask if someone wants a summary, source link, or just context? Toney had a betting ban and is returning to Brentford, with transfer talks involving Arsenal and Chelsea. The alleged £14m tax bill seems exceptionally high and could relate to his agent’s dealings. With rumors of a broader HMRC crackdown on footballers, it raises questions about the accuracy of these claims.Evaluating fact-checking options

To be cautious, I think we should let the user know we can’t verify the information without checking first. I should ask if they want me to fact-check the report. It seems a bit ambiguous, so I'll want to clarify. I can say, “Do you want me to verify this report and summarize the details?” I should also mention that big tax bills often relate to image rights and unpaid overseas taxes but avoid jumping to conclusions.Formulating a response in Chinese

I want to craft a clear response in Chinese for the user. I can offer a few options, such as: 1) "I can fact-check and summarize." 2) "I can provide context using existing public information." 3) "Would you like to subscribe for updates or set reminders?" But it’s important to keep it simple. I’ll also note that the reported £14 million tax bill is unusually high and could relate to tax investigations or avoidance claims, so caution is necessary.